Finding the right words through sound insights

Combine qualitative depth and quantitative certainty with DeepQuant

UX services

Needs assessment

DeepQuant

User research

UX consulting

Starting situation

ForTomorrow helps companies and individuals offset their CO₂ emissions. Based on their own research, they knew that the term “offset” does not always have positive connotations, and they wanted to find out whether a different approach would be more effective.

Project objective

The goal was to evaluate different versions of the speech both qualitatively and quantitatively in order to make an informed decision regarding future word choice.

Result

Although the existing version received a higher rating, it also revealed some weaknesses—the next version can be specifically optimized for trustworthiness and clarity. Willingness to donate was also evaluated.

User
50
Versions
2
Recruitment days
3
Qualitative responses
250
What is DeepQuant?
Understanding qualitatively, verifying quantitatively
DeepQuant quantifies the “why”
Well-founded insights, delivered quickly and efficiently

Testing and validating the effectiveness of language

ForTomorrow helps companies and individuals offset their carbon footprint. However, discussions and our own research have shown that the term “offset” is not viewed positively by everyone—and can raise doubts about its effectiveness or credibility.

Together with us, ForTomorrow wanted to find out whether alternative phrasing is more effective—and how that affects people’s willingness to donate.

The goal of the project was therefore to conduct targeted testing of different versions of the landing and donation pages in order to make sound, user-centered decisions regarding future communication.

DeepQuant provides ForTomorrow with guidance on the next steps

Based on two versions of the text for the home page and donation page, we developed a questionnaire that assessed not only comprehensibility and trust but also willingness to donate. Within three days, 50 people participated —selected from our own panel, which is particularly well-suited for qualitative feedback.

The result: The current version was generally more well-received. Only a few people viewed the term “compensation” critically. The new version performed less well in terms of trust—but provided inspiration for an improved version. The word “protection” stood out as particularly positive and is set to take center stage in the future. This gives ForTomorrow a clear basis for decision-making—and concrete strategies for further developing its communication.

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.